Bleeding edge isn't cost effective

I've got nothing against people who have more money than they need and can indulge their egos by buying things that make them happy. God bless them, I wish I were one of them.

But I'm not. When I purchase something it's a balance between necessity and not wasting limited resources. In the case of high-technology items, that means recognizing the difference between something not being the latest model and being obsolete. Obsolete means that something no longer serves a useful purpose. A radio that picks up multiple radio bands including the audio from analog VHF TV stations would now be of lesser use, but would not be obsolete unless receiving VHF analog TV audio was your only purpose for having it.

I'd argue that the best time to buy SOMETHING YOU ACTUALLY NEED is a compromise between having something that does what you need just before you need it, getting the best possible cost and getting features and/or capacities you won't ever need. With technology products this isn't on the uphill side of a product's popularity; it's on the downhill side; often it's just before a model becomes unavailable. Sometime it's after a model is only available refurbished or used.

PCs are one example. A new PC may have much more memory and be much faster than one that was produced 2 years ago, but may be much more expensive than one built 4 years ago that is being "dumped" to clear warehouse inventory and is more than adequate for your purpose. Another example would be a standard DVD player, which will continue to deliver the same performance and have a useful life of several years until standard DVDs are no longer available.

A third and more timely example would be a large screen flat panel analog TV receiver. The remaining stocks of these are being dumped for very low prices, yet a person who has cable or satellite service could get the same quality programming as before the broadcast conversion of June 2009, and a broadcast user could get more and better quality programming by using a converter box at a lower cost than buying a similar size digital flat panel.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Please note that the answer is case-sensitive!
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

 
" "