epinions says: Having used the Microtek ScanMaker 4800 for about two months, I can say that there are assuredly better choices...I cannot recommend this scanner to anyone who is looking for output quality suitable for photo work, color publications and other detail-oriented efforts...see more

newegg says: the noise level isn't that bad...i would recommend this if you plan on using it for artistic purposes...I bought this because a previous good experience with a Microtek scanner (4900...see more

photo says: I purchased the i900 a couple months ago and had been using it exclusively for 4x5 large format scans...Actually it wasn't too bad of an experience...The i900 produces a very neutral image that can then be tweaked to your heart's content using contrast adjustments and Photoshop's Shadow & Highlight command...see more

shopping.msn says: Large scanning bed, versatle, three connection ports, inexpensive A bit slow, not recommended for 35mm slides I bought two of these Microtek scanners on a recommendation from a friend, a fellow dentist...I have been looking around for a large bed scanner with sufficient resolution to handle my dental x-rays until a colleague of mine turned me on to the 9800XL TMA...No one else comes close to the price to performance ratio of the 9800 XL...see more

tigerdirect says: I bought this scanner a few years ago...I am very pleased with the quality of the scanning...All the features work and the USB connection makes things go faster than my old serial port scanner...see more